Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Special pages
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Article suggestion list
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Moderators' noticeboard
Report a bug
Consumer Rights Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Whaling (gaming industry term)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Why it is a problem== Although the gaming industry often frames ''whaling'' as a harmless and even innovative business model, the underlying mechanics raise serious consumer rights and ethical concerns. The ''Letβs Go Whaling'' presentation makes clear that these systems are deliberately engineered to maximize profit, often at the expense of vulnerable players. Psychological Manipulation These mechanics draw directly from behavioral conditioning and casino playbooks: *Randomized rewards mirror slot machines. *Scarcity tactics and limited-time offers generate artificial urgency. *Social features create peer pressure to spend in order to maintain status or support a team. Lack of Informed Consent Players are rarely provided with: *Transparent spending summaries *Upfront disclosures about odds and probabilities *Warnings about the potential for significant cumulative costs Without these safeguards, informed decision-making is undermined. Regulatory Blind Spots Many countries do not classify loot boxes, gacha pulls, or similar mechanics as gambling because they trade in virtual items rather than direct cash payouts. This loophole leaves a wide regulatory gap, allowing minimal oversight of overly aggressive mechanics. Without age verification requirements in most markets, minors can access and spend on these systems unchecked. The absence of strong consumer protections means vulnerable users, such as problem gamblers and financially insecure individuals, remain exposed to psychologically persuasive designs.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer Rights Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Rights Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Whaling (gaming industry term)
(section)
Add topic