Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Special pages
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Article suggestion list
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Moderators' noticeboard
Report a bug
Consumer Rights Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Canadian Bill S-209
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Defenses== Under the Act, there are two listed defences; "'''Defence β age verification or age estimation 7 (1)''' It is not a defence to a charge under section 5 that the organization believed that the young person referred to in that section was at least 18 years of age unless the organization implemented a prescribed age-verification 30 or age-estimation method to limit access to the pornographic material made available for commercial purposes to individuals who are at least 18 years of age."<ref name=":0" /> And; "'''Defence β legitimate purpose (2)''' No organization shall be convicted of an offence under section 5 if the act that is alleged to constitute the offence has a legitimate purpose related to science, medicine, education or the arts."<ref name=":0" /> The first defence, in plain English, says that a company CANNOT use the defence that they ''thought'' someone was over the age of 18, having not used the Age Verification or Age Estimation services. The second defence is more easy to read, and prohibits the conviction of an offence of 'making available' 'pornographic content' for the legitimate purpose of science, medicine, education, or arts. This sounds great, however in Canadian Law, defences can only be claimed ''after'' a charge has been laid. So an organization who provides such material for a purpose of science, medicine, education, or arts, much be brought to a federal court first to them lay their defence. But as described in the next section, there are some steps that must be taken before anyone goes to court.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer Rights Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Rights Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Canadian Bill S-209
(section)
Add topic