Jump to content

Talk:European Online Safety Act: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From Consumer Rights Wiki
Latest comment: 20 August by Sojourna in topic Relevancy questions
 
Sojourna (talk | contribs)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Relevancy questions ==
==Relevancy questions==


the EU's OSA is obviously a very large and multifaceted thing, but the main question we need to answer is how much of that is relevant to consumers, and consumer rights, and how much is a broader civil rights issue... i.e. where does it make sense to draw the line for which elements of it are relevant to the wiki's mission.  
the EU's OSA is obviously a very large and multifaceted thing, but the main question we need to answer is how much of that is relevant to consumers, and consumer rights, and how much is a broader civil rights issue... i.e. where does it make sense to draw the line for which elements of it are relevant to the wiki's mission.  


Would be happy to hear people's thoughts on this! [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 15:15, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Would be happy to hear people's thoughts on this! [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 15:15, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
:The article as it is currently — and I say this ''loosely'' — "written" is opaque at best and unusable at worst. I would prefer it to be deleted entirely due to its origins and someone could eventually rework it from scratch. Added relevancy article tag. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 01:09, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:09, 20 August 2025

Relevancy questions

[edit source]

the EU's OSA is obviously a very large and multifaceted thing, but the main question we need to answer is how much of that is relevant to consumers, and consumer rights, and how much is a broader civil rights issue... i.e. where does it make sense to draw the line for which elements of it are relevant to the wiki's mission.

Would be happy to hear people's thoughts on this! Keith (talk) 15:15, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article as it is currently — and I say this loosely — "written" is opaque at best and unusable at worst. I would prefer it to be deleted entirely due to its origins and someone could eventually rework it from scratch. Added relevancy article tag. — Sojourna (talk) 01:09, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply